Meliza Haradinaj has said that there is a ''synchronization'' between Vetëvendosje and PSD in the ''attacks'' against former president Vjosa Osmani, which she has described as ''political calculation''.
Haradinaj also said that these two parties, VV and PSD, in addition to the past, are also connected by the same worldview that places, as she said, power over the state and "ideology over national interest", Gazeta Express reports.
''Vjosa's strategic rapprochement with Trump and the codification of American guarantees in law for the protection of Kosovo's sovereignty and territorial integrity was met with resistance from KM Kurti, not with unity. Why? Because this alliance shifts the center of gravity from ideology to real state security, and this upsets the calculations of those who politically feed on internal conflict and external tension,'' she wrote, among other things.
Post:
WHAT IS HIDDEN BEHIND THE 'VV–PSD ALLIANCE' AGAINST VJOSĖ?
The synchronization of Vetëvendosje and PSD in their attacks on President Osmani is a political calculation: two entities with the same ideological DNA are hitting the same target.
VV and PSD are not only connected by a shared political past, but also by a worldview that places power over the state, and ideology over national interest.
Vjosa's strategic rapprochement with Trump and the codification of American guarantees in law for the protection of Kosovo's sovereignty and territorial integrity was met with resistance from KM Kurti, not with unity. Why? Because this alliance shifts the center of gravity from ideology to real state security, and this upsets the calculations of those who feed politically on internal conflict and external tension.
When we add to this the fact that the sister party PSD has openly supported the idea of exchanging territories, while VV attacks the very figure who embodies the protection of territorial integrity, the picture becomes clear: one complements the other in the same goal. It is a division of roles.
KM Kurti's participation in the "anti-Trump coalition" in Barcelona, in a non-recognizing state, was a dangerous political signal: ideological alignment instead of state consolidation. It was not diplomacy. In this logic, the attack on Osmani is not about the person, but about the orientation she represents.
So, the question is not whether there is Kurti-Molliqaj coordination. The question is: how far does this coordination go?
Because when two parties that relativize risks like territorial exchange unite in attacking the figure who defends the state's red line, then we are dealing with a dangerous political scheme.
And the project is clear: politically eliminate the figure that anchors Kosovo in strategic alliances and territorial integrity, to pave the way for narratives that serve power and not the state.
This is the essence. The rest is noise.
t7 live
