On February 2, the personal exhibition of the artist Arbër Sahiti opened at the Gallery of the Faculty of Arts, curated by Ismet Jonuzaj. The exhibition “Çka s'shoh – Chapter II” marks the continuation of Arbër Sahiti's artistic project, bringing a deeper conceptual and visual dimension.
What I Don't See – Chapter II: Art as an Act of Seeing Beyond the Surface
The exhibition “Çka s'shoh – Kapitulli II / What Remains Unseen” is presented as a thoughtful continuation, not as a repetition of what has already been said. It opens a deeper territory of reflection on contemporary man, on the way he sees, but also on what remains outside his sight. From the moment of entering the exhibition space, it becomes clear that we are dealing with a restrained narrative, where silence and darkness are as significant as figures and forms.
This exhibition does not seek to impose direct messages. On the contrary, it builds an internal dialogue with the viewer, challenging them to stop and reflect on their relationship with the image, the body and memory. The title “What I Do Not See” functions as a continuous question, not only about what is missing in the painting, but about what is missing in our daily perception.
The human figure as a metaphor for the blurred man
One of the strongest elements of this exhibition is the treatment of the human figure. In the painting, which depicts a large, darkened head without readable eyes, individual identity disappears. It is not a portrait of a specific person, but a universal, almost representative figure. The head is transformed into a closed space, where thought, fear and silence coexist without being articulated.
This figure does not see us, but neither does it allow itself to be fully seen. It stands before the viewer as a heavy presence, forcing him to reflect on the lack of true communication in a world overloaded with images. The darkness that covers the face is not simply an aesthetic choice, but a commentary on the loss of emotional and spiritual depth in contemporary society.
Landscape as a reflection of the inner state
In the smaller works, where mountain landscapes and seemingly calm horizons appear, nature is not presented as a refuge or as a counterweight to human drama. On the contrary, it carries a silent coldness, an emptiness that reflects the inner state of man. These landscapes are reduced to gray and dark tones, without strong contrasts, creating the feeling of a suspended time. A time that does not perceive a future but that blurs, a time that is stunned in anticipation.
The placement of these works in space, with great distances between them, emphasizes isolation and loneliness. The viewer moves from one landscape to another, but finds no peace. Nature here does not offer answers; it only highlights the void that we often try to fill with quick interpretations.
The body, movement and the impossibility of dialogue
An important chapter of this exhibition is the treatment of the human body in more complex compositions. In the painting where several figures are clustered within an architectural space, the movement seems interrupted, almost frozen. The bodies are close to each other, but not in real communication. The bent limbs and tense positions suggest an attempt, but also a failure, to achieve an authentic connection. Beyond the connection between the bodies, we also see a stillness that each of these bodies conveys, a state of emptiness, loss, without solution.
The architecture that surrounds these bodies creates a sense of confinement. It is not simply a backdrop, but an active part of the narrative, symbolizing the social and mental structures that surround and shape the human being. In this context, the body becomes the bearer of a collective anxiety, where individuality is lost in the face of external pressure.
Exhibition space as part of the work
Of particular importance is the way the works are placed in the space. The minimalism of the environment, the white walls and the controlled lighting create a cold, almost clinical atmosphere. This choice is not neutral, on the contrary it emphasizes the feeling of distance and pushes the viewer to confront the work without emotional mediation.
In this space, each painting breathes on its own, but at the same time communicates with the others. The exhibition functions as a single body, where each part is necessary to understand the whole. There are no superfluous elements, no unnecessary embellishments; everything is thought out to keep the focus on what remains unsaid.
Art as an invitation to see with the mind
“What I Don’t See – Chapter II” is not an exhibition that demands quick consumption. It demands time, attention, and a willingness to stand with discomfort. In an era where the image is immediate and often empty, this exhibition proposes a return to slow, reflective viewing. A deepening into what we are today, or promise to become in the near future.
Her message lies not in what is clearly visible, but in what lies beneath the surface. She reminds us that seeing is not necessarily understanding, and that sometimes the most important truth is what remains invisible. In this sense, the exhibition becomes an act of resistance to the superficial and an invitation to see with the mind, not just with the eyes.
/Express newspaper
t7 live
