If we were to define the clinical state of our society today, the first diagnosis that would be written on our spiritual card would be: “False culture”. This is not simply a statement about the lack of knowledge or a common decline in illiteracy, on the contrary, we are faced with something that is much more insidious and destructive. Unlike classical illiteracy, which was a darkness that heavily covered education, false culture appears as an artificial, blinding light that illuminates nothing, but simply hides the inner abyss. It is not a truncated information, but a frightening excess of appearance, a kind of inflation of image. This excess serves as a brilliant veil over a terrible sterility of being, where man no longer builds himself through painful processes of reflection, but through the accumulation of cultural accessories that serve as false evidence of an intellectual status.
In this miserable situation, culture has long since ceased to be a transformative act and has become a consumer product, where “appearing” has won the final battle against “being”. We are living in a time where imitation has become so perfect that it no longer denies the truth, but clones it, stripping it of any ethical and aesthetic weight. This type of plastic imitation produces a society that possesses all the necessary jargon, quotes great names without ever reading them, and participates in elite rituals where the lighting of the stage is more important than the light of the idea. This is the death of culture as a moral responsibility! It becomes a game without consequences, where big words are used as empty shells to create the illusion of a debate, while in essence a frightening calm of conformism reigns. When ethical weight evaporates, only an empty aesthetic remains, a kind of "fast culture" that offers us the temporary pleasure of being "informed" without ever asking us to make the sacrifice of being "knowledgeable."
This clinical condition is fueled by the fact that fake culture does not come as an external attack, but as an internal mutation of the very institutions and individuals who were supposed to protect it. We are now witnessing the emergence of a new category: educated mediocrity. This is the man who has mastered the technique of appearance, has obtained the necessary degrees and has learned how to operate within the mechanisms of symbolic power, without ever having an authentic relationship with the truth. For him, culture is a costume that is worn according to the occasion, an instrument for integration and not a means of emancipation. This character inhabits the public space with a false authority, suffocating every spark of originality with the weight of a decontextualized knowledge. Here the final transfiguration occurs: the quasi-intellectual becomes the guardian of fake culture, creating an environment where integrity is seen as naivety and where adaptation to the banal is considered professional maturity. Consequently, this sterility of being produces a kind of “death in hyper-surfacing”, where today’s man has lost the ability to remain silent and wait for thought to mature. False culture demands immediate reaction, demands spectacle and demands constant approval. It is terrified of depth because depth requires time and pain, two elements that cannot be translated into clicks or quick social success. Thus, society is transformed into a gigantic unreal exhibition, where we live in an “illuminated void”, where everything shines, but nothing warms and nothing pushes us towards a truly transcendent search. We have created a reality where the mask has become so attached to the face that any attempt to tear it off is perceived as an act of violence rather than an act of liberation. In the end, this diagnosis confronts us with a bitter truth: the greatest danger is not that we are forgetting culture, but that we are learning to live with its imitation to the point where we no longer recognize the original. When deformation is normalized, it ceases to be a problem and becomes a living environment. A society that feeds on false culture is like an organism that consumes food without nutritional value; it may seem full, but in fact it is starving for meaning. This book aims to be precisely a surgical act against this normalization, an attempt to restore the weight of the word and to rush back towards what is essential, organic and unsaleable. For only by accepting the extent of this disease that has gripped us today can we begin to seek again that kind of intellectuality that is not status, but resistance to what tends to transform us into shadows of ourselves. /Heyza