This week marks two extraordinary anniversaries. One is that of Sir David Attenborough, while just four days after his birth, another important cultural event took place: the premiere of Dmitri Shostakovich's First Symphony.
The work was first performed in Leningrad on May 12, 1926, by the Leningrad Philharmonic, under the direction of conductor Nicolai Malko.
Shostakovich was only 19 when he composed this symphony. The four-beat structure is perhaps its only traditional element. The young composer had absorbed everything he could about how orchestral music should sound and behave, but he had the courage to subvert these rules and play with them.
There is no condescension in this work to previous generations of Russian symphonists or orchestral pioneers. On the contrary, the First Symphony sounds with an extraordinary self-confidence, at once optimistic and piercing in its irony.
From the distorted trumpet call at the opening, Shostakovich challenges expectations of how a symphony should begin. It is not a triumphant entrance, but a dissonant, strange, and provocative question mark. The first movement resembles a circus: a parade of characters entering and exiting the stage, often followed by a cartoon bear, a palazzo, or a bassoon.
The energy that Shostakovich creates through the clash of ideas, moving from one to the next as if the symphony were a fast-paced film, continues with the same vibrancy in the second movement. Here, the piano is added to the orchestral texture, and it is there that one of the sources of the work's creative energy is revealed.
As a teenager, Shostakovich played piano for silent film screenings in Soviet cinemas. In the piano solos of this symphony, he turns the music into a farce of chaos and humor that would have made Buster Keaton proud.
The second movement builds to a climax that is both frightening and ironic: a sudden fanfare overwhelms the entire orchestra, while the solo piano chords seem as if the pianist cannot keep up with the speed of the music.
There is still no trace of the bombast or overt ideology that would appear in Shostakovich's later symphonies. Yet the feeling is present, especially at the climax of the scherzo, where the cartoonish world seems to suddenly come to life.
The slow movement that follows is one of the most genuinely passionate pieces Shostakovich ever wrote. The solo oboe and solo cello spur the orchestra into a melodic explosion that resembles Shakespearean drama more than circus tricks.
The final moment brings all these worlds together. The symphony closes with an irresistible flow of energy, where pure emotion and extraordinary enthusiasm come together. It is, quite possibly, one of the most confident and creative first symphonies ever written by a teenager, although there is no shortage of competition in the history of music, from Mendelssohn to Schubert.
The First Symphony proclaims a world of possibilities, where musical conventions are joyfully overturned in an explosion of modernist creativity, at once comic and profound. It sounds like the voice of a unique symphonic avant-garde, which could have heralded an era of creative freedom for Shostakovich and for generations of composers.
But history took a different turn. In Shostakovich's later symphonies, especially from the mid-1930s onwards, one feels the chill of that freedom and the daily fear of living in Stalin's Soviet Union.
The confidence, joy, and courage audible on every page of the First Symphony remain a marvel that Shostakovich never fully replicated. A century later, this work continues to sound as fresh, bold, and shocking. /GazetaExpress/
t7 live
